Is a Simplified Language the Answer?

Click here to listen to the BBC broadcast, ‘Should we relax English spelling rules?’

In this BBC World Update story, Professor John Wells of University College, London, proposes simplifying the English language in many ways: dropping letters that confuse meaning or pronunciation (like the silent e at the end of give), adding letters to ease pronunciation (like adding an extra v to the word river, making it rivver), and choosing one standard spelling for the notorious “words often confused” (like there, their, and they’re), to name a few.

Other suggestions include another of the confusing sets:

Get rid of the two types of its (it’s and its) as it is hardly likely to confuse your meaning. If removing the apostrophe is a problem, then leave a space: We’ll becomes we ll”

The latter possibility — we ll — looks just plain weird to me. But I guess anything I use consistently will seem normal eventually. Our language is constantly growing and changing. And, as my husband reminds me when I whine about wrinkles and graying hair on occasion, the alternative is death.


Unless otherwise noted, all images and text are copyright © Viable Design. All rights reserved.


© 2008, mrshawke-dot-com.

Creative Commons License
Most of my teaching resources are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License, which means you can feel free to use them with attribution as long as you don’t use them commercially. If you’re not sure, don’t hesitate to ask me. Unfortunately, I am currently unable to send out my tests and quizzes, but I am hoping to establish a less time-consuming alternative for this in the near future. Sorry!!


  • RSS
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • PDF
  • Diigo
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Netvibes
  • Add to favorites

Post to Twitter

This entry was posted in language, links. Bookmark the permalink.